🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.