🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered favorable results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."